| 1 | Automotive Quality Management | IATF 16949; ISO 9001 may support general quality management but does not replace automotive-specific requirements. | Check the certificate scope, manufacturing location, validity period, certification body, and whether design and production activities are covered. | Valid automotive quality certification covering the actual throttle pedal sensor production site. | 15% | Certificate applies only to another site, process, or product category. |
| 2 | Functional Safety Capability | ISO 26262 principles for road-vehicle functional safety; the required Automotive Safety Integrity Level depends on the vehicle safety concept. | Ask for the sensor safety concept, hardware and software safety analysis, diagnostic coverage, fault reaction strategy, and production traceability. | Supplier can provide project-specific safety evidence instead of only a generic “functional safety” statement. | 15% | No defined diagnostic behavior for open circuit, short circuit, stuck signal, or dual-channel disagreement. |
| 3 | Electrical and Signal Performance | Customer drawings and specifications; typical parameters include supply voltage, output range, linearity, hysteresis, repeatability, and current consumption. | Review test methods for the full pedal travel, electrical angle or displacement range, temperature range, load conditions, and end-of-line calibration. | Every critical parameter has a defined tolerance, measurement method, calibrated equipment, and acceptance limit. | 15% | Supplier provides only a typical curve without tolerance limits or test conditions. |
| 4 | Environmental Durability | ISO 16750 for electrical and electronic equipment in road vehicles; IEC 60068 methods may be used for temperature, humidity, vibration, and mechanical testing. | Check high and low temperature operation, temperature cycling, damp heat, vibration, mechanical shock, dust, water, and corrosion tests as applicable to the installation location. | Test severity is linked to the vehicle mounting location and customer duty cycle, not copied from a generic catalog. | 12% | No post-test functional measurement or no documented correlation between test severity and vehicle use. |
| 5 | EMC and Electrical Transient Testing | ISO 11452 and CISPR 25 for automotive immunity and emissions; ISO 7637-2 for conducted electrical transients; UNECE Regulation No. 10 may be relevant for vehicle electrical compatibility. | Verify conducted and radiated immunity, emissions, supply-line pulses, ground offsets, and signal integrity under operating and fault conditions. | Reports identify the exact sample, wiring, harness length, operating mode, test level, equipment, and pass/fail result. | 10% | Only a general EMC declaration is supplied, with no method, configuration, or measured results. |
| 6 | Laboratory Competence | ISO/IEC 17025 for testing and calibration laboratory competence. | Confirm whether internal or external laboratories are used, whether the accreditation scope covers the relevant method, and whether equipment calibration is current. | Critical qualification tests are performed by a competent laboratory with traceable calibration records. | 8% | Test report lacks laboratory identity, equipment details, calibration status, or accreditation scope. |
| 7 | Process Control and Error Prevention | APQP, PPAP, FMEA, control plans, statistical process control, and measurement system analysis are common automotive quality practices. | Review process flow, design and process FMEA, control plan, first-article approval, poka-yoke devices, gauge repeatability and reproducibility, and reaction plans. | Critical characteristics are clearly identified and monitored at incoming, in-process, and final inspection stages. | 10% | Inspection depends mainly on manual judgment and lacks documented reaction limits. |
| 8 | Traceability and Change Management | Automotive customer-specific requirements; production and design changes should be formally reviewed and approved before implementation. | Check lot or serial traceability for raw materials, electronic components, tooling, operators, test results, and shipment records. | Supplier can identify affected lots and test history within a defined retrieval time. | 6% | Unauthorized material, software, tooling, or process changes are possible without customer notification. |
| 9 | Supplier and Component Control | Incoming inspection, approved supplier lists, material specifications, and counterfeit-part prevention controls. | Review controls for magnets, position-sensing elements, connectors, terminals, plastics, springs, lubricants, and other safety-relevant components. | Critical components have defined specifications, incoming tests, lot records, and controlled alternate-source approval. | 5% | Components are purchased solely by lowest price without documented qualification or authenticity controls. |
| 10 | Corrective Action and Delivery Reliability | Structured problem-solving methods such as 8D, root-cause analysis, containment, and effectiveness verification. | Request anonymized evidence of nonconformance handling, response time, permanent corrective action, recurrence prevention, capacity planning, and on-time delivery records. | Supplier reports measurable corrective-action effectiveness and maintains contingency plans for tooling, materials, equipment, and production capacity. | 4% | Repeated defects are closed with sorting or replacement only, without verified root-cause elimination. |