| Alloy selection | Can explain the trade-offs among commonly used zinc die-casting alloys, such as Zamak 2, Zamak 3, and Zamak 5, and recommend an alloy based on strength, ductility, corrosion exposure, and finishing needs. | Alloy specification, material certificates, and a documented rationale for the proposed grade. | The alloy affects mechanical performance, castability, and suitability for the part’s operating environment. |
| Tool and part design | Reviews wall thickness, ribs, draft, parting lines, gates, vents, and ejection before tooling is released; identifies features that may cause filling or removal problems. | Design-for-manufacturing feedback, tool layout, and agreed revisions to the part drawing. | Early design review can reduce tooling changes and improve repeatability. |
| Tooling engineering | Plans the die around part geometry, expected production volume, cooling, maintenance, and the customer’s ownership and storage requirements. | Tooling scope, trial plan, maintenance schedule, and written terms for tool ownership and access. | Tool condition and maintenance have a direct influence on production consistency and tool life. |
| Machine and process fit | Selects die-casting equipment to suit projected shot size, projected area, die dimensions, and production requirements rather than relying on machine tonnage alone. | Equipment list, machine-to-tool compatibility review, and process parameters from a production trial. | Appropriate equipment and controlled settings help maintain stable filling and part quality. |
| Dimensional control | Measures critical features against the approved drawing and agrees on tolerances based on part geometry, tooling, and the inspection method. | Inspection plan, calibrated measuring equipment records, and sample dimensional reports. | There is no single tolerance that suits every zinc casting; requirements should be specified and verified feature by feature. |
| Defect prevention | Monitors relevant casting defects, including porosity, cold shuts, flash, and surface imperfections, and uses documented controls and corrective actions. | Control plan, defect records, agreed acceptance criteria, and corrective-action examples. | Defect limits depend on the part’s function and inspection method, so acceptance criteria should be agreed before production. |
| Secondary operations | Can coordinate trimming, machining, deburring, finishing, and assembly to the drawing and agreed appearance requirements. | Process flow, finishing specifications, sample parts, and inspection records for completed operations. | Integrated operations can simplify supplier coordination, but each finish and critical feature still needs verification. |
| Quality management | Maintains controlled procedures for incoming materials, production inspection, nonconforming product, traceability, and corrective action. Relevant certifications may include ISO 9001; automotive programs may require IATF 16949. | Current certificates with scope and issuing-body details, plus records showing how the system is applied to the product. | A certificate is useful evidence of a management system, but it does not by itself prove that a specific part will meet its requirements. |
| Capacity and delivery | Provides a production plan that accounts for tooling trials, approved samples, regular capacity, maintenance, and contingency planning. | Lead-time assumptions, capacity plan, production schedule, and escalation process for supply interruptions. | A realistic plan is more useful than an unsupported capacity or delivery promise. |
| Supplier assessment | Supports a technical review, sample approval, and an audit or remote assessment appropriate to the product’s risk and production volume. | Completed assessment findings, sample approval records, and documented actions for any open issues. | The best choice is the manufacturer whose verified capabilities match the part’s technical, quality, and supply requirements. |