| 1 | Material grade and traceability | Confirm the exact stainless steel grade, heat or cast number, product form, and applicable material specification before production. | Review the material test certificate for chemical composition, mechanical properties, heat number, and specification compliance. Match the certificate to the forging identification. | An incorrect grade or lost traceability can cause unsuitable corrosion resistance, strength, heat treatment, or service performance. |
| 2 | Hot-work temperature window | Many stainless forging operations use a hot-working range broadly around 900–1200°C, but the acceptable range depends on the grade, billet size, and supplier process. The grade-specific forging temperature must govern. | Request the approved forging procedure, furnace calibration records, temperature charts, and confirmation of the minimum finishing temperature for the selected grade. | Overheating may promote excessive grain growth, oxidation, or incipient melting. Forging below the suitable range can increase deformation resistance, cracking, and non-uniform properties. |
| 3 | Heating uniformity and furnace control | Heating should be controlled to reduce excessive temperature gradients between the surface and core. Furnace set points should not be treated as proof of the workpiece temperature. | Check thermocouple calibration, furnace uniformity surveys where applicable, load records, soak-time criteria, and actual workpiece temperature monitoring. | Uneven heating can produce internal stresses, localized overheating, incomplete deformation, dimensional variation, and inconsistent microstructure. |
| 4 | Forging reduction and deformation practice | The supplier should define the forging route, reduction sequence, die fill requirements, and any minimum deformation needed to close internal discontinuities and achieve the specified shape. | Review process-flow diagrams, forging-strategy records, billet and finished dimensions, press or hammer records, and dimensional inspection results. | Insufficient or poorly distributed deformation may leave porosity, segregation, laps, or an unfavorable grain flow in critical sections. |
| 5 | Heat treatment after forging | Specify the required solution annealing, quenching, tempering, or aging condition according to the grade and application. Austenitic grades commonly require solution treatment when specified; precipitation-hardening grades require tightly controlled aging cycles. | Request heat-treatment charts showing time, temperature, cooling method, furnace identification, load number, and calibration status, together with hardness or mechanical-test results where required. | Improper heat treatment can reduce corrosion resistance, hardness, strength, toughness, or dimensional stability and may create harmful precipitates. |
| 6 | Surface quality and non-destructive testing | Define acceptance criteria for scale, laps, seams, cracks, underfill, and machining allowance. Select liquid penetrant, magnetic-particle, ultrasonic, or visual inspection according to the alloy and component geometry. | Review inspection procedures, personnel qualifications, calibration records, NDT reports, indications maps, and repair or rejection records. | Unidentified surface or internal discontinuities may initiate fatigue cracks, leakage, premature corrosion, or in-service failure. |
| 7 | Final dimensions, hardness, and acceptance records | Agree on drawing tolerances, machining allowance, flatness or runout limits, hardness range, sampling frequency, packaging, and marking before placing the order. | Require a final inspection report containing dimensional results, hardness data, material certificates, heat-treatment records, NDT results, and complete traceability. | Unclear acceptance criteria can lead to assembly problems, hidden nonconformities, delayed approval, and disputes over responsibility. |