High-speed lift selection in 2026 should begin with measurable performance, not impressive speed claims. ISO 8100-1 and ISO 8100-2 define safety and verification requirements for lift systems. They do not prescribe one universal travel speed. For global buyers, compliance must match local codes, seismic conditions, fire strategies, and building height.
Speed alone can mislead. CIBSE Guide D recommends evaluating handling capacity, interval, waiting time, acceleration, jerk, and passenger comfort together. In practice, a 10 m/s lift may perform poorly if dispatch software, door timing, or lobby planning is weak. Passengers notice the pause between floors. They also notice vibration and sudden braking. Small details matter.
Energy performance deserves equal attention. The International Energy Agency reports that buildings consume roughly 30% of global final energy. Regenerative drives, standby controls, efficient motors, and traffic-based operation can reduce avoidable consumption. ISO 25745 provides methods for measuring lift energy performance, supporting clearer comparisons between suppliers.
However, testing conditions can differ. Buyers should request measured data under realistic traffic loads, not laboratory figures alone. I would also question every “maintenance-free” claim. High-speed systems still need documented inspections, fault records, emergency operation tests, and trained local technicians. Reliability is demonstrated over time.